Arbitrage Node: Platform source review

Arbitrage Node appears in a source record attributed to Financial Markets Authority. The identity, jurisdiction and finding below define the scope of this review.

The identity in the source

Recorded name

Arbitrage Node

Source authority

Financial Markets Authority

Source jurisdiction

New Zealand

Recorded category

Unregistered/Unlicensed entity offering financial products or services

Source validation date

2024-01-15

Source modification date

2024-01-15

Additional source context

We recommend caution when dealing with Arbitrage Node and its website arbitragenode.org.It claims to be based in New Zealand and offers various financial products, including managed investment plans, financial advice, and loans, but is not a registered financial service provider in New Zealand.Arbitrage Node is using a fake Certificate of Incorporation document using the Companies Register details of New Zealand Education Consultant Services Limited (registration number 1896613). The Director of this company has confirmed no association with Arbitrage Node.Arbitrage Node has also used the Companies Register details of Arbitrage Limited (registration number 1172705), however this company was deregistered in 2011. ENTITY NAME: Arbitrage NodeWEBSITE: arbitragenode.orgADDRESS: (Alleged) Tauranga, New ZealandEMAIL: support@arbitragenode.org

Read the primary authority source

Read the finding in context

The recorded category is reproduced above. Read the linked authority’s finding in its own terms. An authorization warning, restriction or other regulatory notice does not by itself establish every allegation about an entity or prove a particular person’s loss.

Match the record to your experience

Compare the complete website or profile address, payment destination and communications you used. A similar name is not enough to identify the same operator. Retain original messages, payment references and dates so that any differences remain visible.

Follow the evidence and payment route

CryptoDac investigates cryptocurrency fraud, traces digital assets and develops evidence to pursue appropriate lawful recovery routes. For a matter relating to Arbitrage Node, the starting questions are which identity presented the service, how payments were sent, which records support the sequence and which relevant platform or authority may be able to act.

A useful chronology separates amounts actually sent from displayed balances or advertised returns. Public transaction records can show movement between addresses, while ownership and legal responsibility may require further evidence. Recovery strategy depends on the facts and the actions of the relevant parties.

Preserve what can support a review

Keep exact website addresses, dated correspondence, transaction IDs, network details and the original records of payment and withdrawal requests. Describe uncertainty honestly. Do not send seed phrases, private keys, passwords or one-time codes.

Dates and source scope

Source dates are labelled separately above. The publication date on this article records its CryptoDac release and is not a claim that CryptoDac published the authority’s warning on its original date. Source records may change; consult the linked authority for its current notice and distinguish its jurisdiction from other countries.

Source and investigation methodology · Request a correction · Return to Scam Brokers