Swift Remita: Platform source review

Swift Remita appears in a source record attributed to Financial Markets Authority. The identity, jurisdiction and finding below define the scope of this review.

The identity in the source

Recorded name

Swift Remita

Website or profile identified in the source

Swiftremita.com

Source authority

Financial Markets Authority

Source jurisdiction

New Zealand

Recorded category

Unregistered/Unlicensed entity offering financial products or services|Registered/Licensed entity impersonators|Fraud and Other Types of Misconduct

Products identified

Money-market instruments|Investment contracts

Source registration date

2025-06-27

Source validation date

2025-06-27

Source modification date

2025-06-27

Additional source context

The FMA has been made aware of a fake e-banking platform – Swift Remita. This platform offers term deposits, loans and money transfer services. However, it is operating an investment scam intended to defraud investors. An investor has reported that they were unable to withdraw the funds they deposited with Swift Remita. When they attempted to withdraw their money, Swift Remita requested a large payment before they would release the funds. This is a common feature of investment scams. Even if investors pay the requested fees, no funds will be released. Swift Remita falsely claims to be based in New Zealand. It is not a registered entity and is not registered to provide banking services from or in New Zealand.When dealing with any financial service providers that claim to be based in New Zealand, investors are encouraged to check their registration status.

Read the primary authority source

Read the finding in context

The recorded category is reproduced above. Read the linked authority’s finding in its own terms. An authorization warning, restriction or other regulatory notice does not by itself establish every allegation about an entity or prove a particular person’s loss.

Match the record to your experience

Compare the complete website or profile address, payment destination and communications you used. A similar name is not enough to identify the same operator. Retain original messages, payment references and dates so that any differences remain visible.

Follow the evidence and payment route

CryptoDac investigates cryptocurrency fraud, traces digital assets and develops evidence to pursue appropriate lawful recovery routes. For a matter relating to Swift Remita, the starting questions are which identity presented the service, how payments were sent, which records support the sequence and which relevant platform or authority may be able to act.

A useful chronology separates amounts actually sent from displayed balances or advertised returns. Public transaction records can show movement between addresses, while ownership and legal responsibility may require further evidence. Recovery strategy depends on the facts and the actions of the relevant parties.

Preserve what can support a review

Keep exact website addresses, dated correspondence, transaction IDs, network details and the original records of payment and withdrawal requests. Describe uncertainty honestly. Do not send seed phrases, private keys, passwords or one-time codes.

Dates and source scope

Source dates are labelled separately above. The publication date on this article records its CryptoDac release and is not a claim that CryptoDac published the authority’s warning on its original date. Source records may change; consult the linked authority for its current notice and distinguish its jurisdiction from other countries.

Source and investigation methodology · Request a correction · Return to Scam Brokers